Publications
2019
Garnett, B; Mahod, K; Nguyen, M; Al-Khateeb, A; Liu, S; Boyd, R; Oh, H
Cephalometric comparison of adult anterior open bite treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances. Journal Article
In: Angle Orthodontist, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 3-9, 2019.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: AAOF, Cone-beam computed tomography, Cranial base, craniofacial, Discrepency Index, extraction, fixed appliances, hyperdivergent, mandibular asymmetry, Mandibular fixed retainer, Mandibular remodeling, mapping, open bite, Peer Assessment Rating Index, Posttreatment, research, x-ray
@article{Garnett2019,
title = {Cephalometric comparison of adult anterior open bite treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances.},
author = {B Garnett and K Mahod and M Nguyen and A Al-Khateeb and S Liu and R Boyd and H Oh},
url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137127/},
doi = {10.2319/010418-4.1},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-00},
journal = {Angle Orthodontist},
volume = {89},
number = {1},
pages = {3-9},
abstract = {To compare fixed appliances and clear aligner therapy in correcting anterior open bite and in controlling the vertical dimension in adult patients with hyperdivergent skeletal patterns.},
keywords = {AAOF, Cone-beam computed tomography, Cranial base, craniofacial, Discrepency Index, extraction, fixed appliances, hyperdivergent, mandibular asymmetry, Mandibular fixed retainer, Mandibular remodeling, mapping, open bite, Peer Assessment Rating Index, Posttreatment, research, x-ray},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2017
Hwang, Hyeon-Shik; Oh, Min-Hee; Oh, Hee-Kyun; Oh, Heesoo
Surgery-first approach in correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry Journal Article
In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 255-267, 2017.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: AAOF, adult, Class III, Cranial base, Discrepency Index, hyperdivergent, mandibular asymmetry, Mandibular fixed retainer, Mandibular remodeling, mapping, open bite, orthodontic, surgery-first
@article{Hwang2017,
title = {Surgery-first approach in correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry},
author = {Hyeon-Shik Hwang and Min-Hee Oh and Hee-Kyun Oh and Heesoo Oh},
url = {http://162.214.24.32/~crilorg/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Surgery-first-approach-in-correctingskeletal-CLass-III_AJODO-2017.pdf},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.040},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-08-01},
urldate = {2017-08-01},
journal = {American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics},
volume = {152},
number = {2},
pages = {255-267},
abstract = {This case report describes a surgical orthodontic case that used the recently introduced surgery-first approach to correct a severe skeletal Class III malocclusion. A 19-year-old woman presented with severe mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry; she had been waiting for growth completion in order to pursue surgical correction. After prediction of the postsurgical tooth movement and surgical simulation, 2-jaw surgery that included maxillary advancement and differential mandibular setback was performed using a surgery-first approach. Immediate facial improvement was achieved and postsurgical orthodontic treatment was efficiently carried out. The total treatment time was 16 months. The patient's facial appearance improved significantly and a stable surgical orthodontic outcome was obtained. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:255-67) },
keywords = {AAOF, adult, Class III, Cranial base, Discrepency Index, hyperdivergent, mandibular asymmetry, Mandibular fixed retainer, Mandibular remodeling, mapping, open bite, orthodontic, surgery-first},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2010
Xu, T-M; Zhang, X; Oh, HS; Boyd, R; Korn, El; Baumrind, S
A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) Comparing Maxillary Molar Anchorage Loss Using Two Retraction Techniques. Journal Article
In: American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 544-5, 2010.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, clinical orthodontist, Cone-beam computed tomography, Cranial base, hyperdivergent, Mandibular fixed retainer, open bite, orthodontic, Peer Assessment Rating Index, retrospective
@article{Xu2010,
title = {A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) Comparing Maxillary Molar Anchorage Loss Using Two Retraction Techniques.},
author = {T-M Xu and X Zhang and HS Oh and R Boyd and El Korn and S Baumrind},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21055588/},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.027},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-11-00},
journal = {American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics},
volume = {138},
number = {5},
pages = {544-5},
abstract = {The objective of this pilot randomized clinical trial was to investigate the relative effectiveness of anchorage conservation of en-masse and 2-step retraction techniques during maximum anchorage treatment in patients with Angle Class I and Class II malocclusions.},
keywords = {adult, clinical orthodontist, Cone-beam computed tomography, Cranial base, hyperdivergent, Mandibular fixed retainer, open bite, orthodontic, Peer Assessment Rating Index, retrospective},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2008
Xu, T-M; Korn, EL; Liu, Y; Oh, HS; Lee, KH; Baumrind, S
"Facial Attractiveness": Ranking of End-of-Treatment Facial Photographs by Chinese and U.S. Orthodontists. Journal Article
In: American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 74-84, 2008.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: AAOF, Adolescents, anterior openbite, clinical orthodontist, Cone-beam computed tomography, Cranial base, hyperdivergent, Mandibular fixed retainer, open bite, retrospective
@article{Xu2008,
title = {"Facial Attractiveness": Ranking of End-of-Treatment Facial Photographs by Chinese and U.S. Orthodontists.},
author = {T-M Xu and EL Korn and Y Liu and HS Oh and KH Lee and S Baumrind},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18617106/},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.023},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-07-00},
journal = {American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics},
volume = {134},
number = {1},
pages = {74-84},
abstract = {In this study, we assessed agreement and disagreement among pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists in the ranking for "facial attractiveness" of end-of-treatment photographs of growing Chinese and white orthodontic patients.},
keywords = {AAOF, Adolescents, anterior openbite, clinical orthodontist, Cone-beam computed tomography, Cranial base, hyperdivergent, Mandibular fixed retainer, open bite, retrospective},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
0000
Garnett, Bella Shen; Mahood, Kimberly; Nguyen, Mai; Al-Khateeb, Aliaa; Liu, Siqi; Boyd, Robert; Oh, Heesoo
Cephalometric comparison of anterior openbite tx using clear aligners and fixed appliances Journal Article Forthcoming
In: Angle Orthodontist, Forthcoming.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, anterior openbite, clear aligners, fixed appliances, hyperdivergent, open bite, vertical control
@article{Garnett,
title = {Cephalometric comparison of anterior openbite tx using clear aligners and fixed appliances},
author = {Bella Shen Garnett and Kimberly Mahood and Mai Nguyen and Aliaa Al-Khateeb and Siqi Liu and Robert Boyd and Heesoo Oh},
doi = {10.2319/010418-4.1},
journal = {Angle Orthodontist},
abstract = {Objectives: To compare fixed appliances and clear aligner therapy in correcting anterior open biteand in controlling the vertical dimension in adult patients with hyperdivergent skeletal patterns.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, two treatment groups of adult (_18 years old)hyperdivergent patients (mandibular plane angles of _388) with anterior open bites were included:17 fixed appliance patients and 36 clear aligner patients. Thirteen cephalometric measurementsrepresenting the vertical dimension were reported for each group. A two-sample t-test was used toassess differences in changes in mandibular plane angle and overbite between the two treatmentgroups.
Results: There were no statistical differences found in the magnitude of overbite correction and thechanges in any of the cephalometric measurements for vertical control. The clear aligner groupshowed a slightly greater amount of lower incisor extrusion (P . .009). The main mechanism ofopen bite correction was similar between the two treatment groups and was accomplished throughretroclination of the upper and lower incisors while maintaining the vertical position of the upper andlower molars.
Conclusions: Cephalometric comparison of anterior open bite correction and changes in themandibular plane angle associated with use of clear aligners and fixed appliances did notdemonstrate statistically significant differences in adult hyperdivergent patients. (Angle Orthod.0000;00:000–000.)},
keywords = {adult, anterior openbite, clear aligners, fixed appliances, hyperdivergent, open bite, vertical control},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, two treatment groups of adult (_18 years old)hyperdivergent patients (mandibular plane angles of _388) with anterior open bites were included:17 fixed appliance patients and 36 clear aligner patients. Thirteen cephalometric measurementsrepresenting the vertical dimension were reported for each group. A two-sample t-test was used toassess differences in changes in mandibular plane angle and overbite between the two treatmentgroups.
Results: There were no statistical differences found in the magnitude of overbite correction and thechanges in any of the cephalometric measurements for vertical control. The clear aligner groupshowed a slightly greater amount of lower incisor extrusion (P . .009). The main mechanism ofopen bite correction was similar between the two treatment groups and was accomplished throughretroclination of the upper and lower incisors while maintaining the vertical position of the upper andlower molars.
Conclusions: Cephalometric comparison of anterior open bite correction and changes in themandibular plane angle associated with use of clear aligners and fixed appliances did notdemonstrate statistically significant differences in adult hyperdivergent patients. (Angle Orthod.0000;00:000–000.)
Garnett, B; Mahod, K; Nguyen, M; Al-Khateeb, A; Liu, S; Boyd, R; Oh, H
Cephalometric comparison of adult anterior open bite treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances. Journal Article
In: Angle Orthodontist, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 3-9, 2019.
@article{Garnett2019,
title = {Cephalometric comparison of adult anterior open bite treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances.},
author = {B Garnett and K Mahod and M Nguyen and A Al-Khateeb and S Liu and R Boyd and H Oh},
url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137127/},
doi = {10.2319/010418-4.1},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-00},
journal = {Angle Orthodontist},
volume = {89},
number = {1},
pages = {3-9},
abstract = {To compare fixed appliances and clear aligner therapy in correcting anterior open bite and in controlling the vertical dimension in adult patients with hyperdivergent skeletal patterns.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hwang, Hyeon-Shik; Oh, Min-Hee; Oh, Hee-Kyun; Oh, Heesoo
Surgery-first approach in correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry Journal Article
In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 255-267, 2017.
@article{Hwang2017,
title = {Surgery-first approach in correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry},
author = {Hyeon-Shik Hwang and Min-Hee Oh and Hee-Kyun Oh and Heesoo Oh},
url = {http://162.214.24.32/~crilorg/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Surgery-first-approach-in-correctingskeletal-CLass-III_AJODO-2017.pdf},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.040},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-08-01},
urldate = {2017-08-01},
journal = {American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics},
volume = {152},
number = {2},
pages = {255-267},
abstract = {This case report describes a surgical orthodontic case that used the recently introduced surgery-first approach to correct a severe skeletal Class III malocclusion. A 19-year-old woman presented with severe mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry; she had been waiting for growth completion in order to pursue surgical correction. After prediction of the postsurgical tooth movement and surgical simulation, 2-jaw surgery that included maxillary advancement and differential mandibular setback was performed using a surgery-first approach. Immediate facial improvement was achieved and postsurgical orthodontic treatment was efficiently carried out. The total treatment time was 16 months. The patient's facial appearance improved significantly and a stable surgical orthodontic outcome was obtained. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:255-67) },
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Xu, T-M; Zhang, X; Oh, HS; Boyd, R; Korn, El; Baumrind, S
A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) Comparing Maxillary Molar Anchorage Loss Using Two Retraction Techniques. Journal Article
In: American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 544-5, 2010.
@article{Xu2010,
title = {A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) Comparing Maxillary Molar Anchorage Loss Using Two Retraction Techniques.},
author = {T-M Xu and X Zhang and HS Oh and R Boyd and El Korn and S Baumrind},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21055588/},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.027},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-11-00},
journal = {American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics},
volume = {138},
number = {5},
pages = {544-5},
abstract = {The objective of this pilot randomized clinical trial was to investigate the relative effectiveness of anchorage conservation of en-masse and 2-step retraction techniques during maximum anchorage treatment in patients with Angle Class I and Class II malocclusions.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Xu, T-M; Korn, EL; Liu, Y; Oh, HS; Lee, KH; Baumrind, S
"Facial Attractiveness": Ranking of End-of-Treatment Facial Photographs by Chinese and U.S. Orthodontists. Journal Article
In: American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 74-84, 2008.
@article{Xu2008,
title = {"Facial Attractiveness": Ranking of End-of-Treatment Facial Photographs by Chinese and U.S. Orthodontists.},
author = {T-M Xu and EL Korn and Y Liu and HS Oh and KH Lee and S Baumrind},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18617106/},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.023},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-07-00},
journal = {American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics},
volume = {134},
number = {1},
pages = {74-84},
abstract = {In this study, we assessed agreement and disagreement among pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists in the ranking for "facial attractiveness" of end-of-treatment photographs of growing Chinese and white orthodontic patients.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Garnett, Bella Shen; Mahood, Kimberly; Nguyen, Mai; Al-Khateeb, Aliaa; Liu, Siqi; Boyd, Robert; Oh, Heesoo
Cephalometric comparison of anterior openbite tx using clear aligners and fixed appliances Journal Article Forthcoming
In: Angle Orthodontist, Forthcoming.
@article{Garnett,
title = {Cephalometric comparison of anterior openbite tx using clear aligners and fixed appliances},
author = {Bella Shen Garnett and Kimberly Mahood and Mai Nguyen and Aliaa Al-Khateeb and Siqi Liu and Robert Boyd and Heesoo Oh},
doi = {10.2319/010418-4.1},
journal = {Angle Orthodontist},
abstract = {Objectives: To compare fixed appliances and clear aligner therapy in correcting anterior open biteand in controlling the vertical dimension in adult patients with hyperdivergent skeletal patterns.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, two treatment groups of adult (_18 years old)hyperdivergent patients (mandibular plane angles of _388) with anterior open bites were included:17 fixed appliance patients and 36 clear aligner patients. Thirteen cephalometric measurementsrepresenting the vertical dimension were reported for each group. A two-sample t-test was used toassess differences in changes in mandibular plane angle and overbite between the two treatmentgroups.
Results: There were no statistical differences found in the magnitude of overbite correction and thechanges in any of the cephalometric measurements for vertical control. The clear aligner groupshowed a slightly greater amount of lower incisor extrusion (P . .009). The main mechanism ofopen bite correction was similar between the two treatment groups and was accomplished throughretroclination of the upper and lower incisors while maintaining the vertical position of the upper andlower molars.
Conclusions: Cephalometric comparison of anterior open bite correction and changes in themandibular plane angle associated with use of clear aligners and fixed appliances did notdemonstrate statistically significant differences in adult hyperdivergent patients. (Angle Orthod.0000;00:000–000.)},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, two treatment groups of adult (_18 years old)hyperdivergent patients (mandibular plane angles of _388) with anterior open bites were included:17 fixed appliance patients and 36 clear aligner patients. Thirteen cephalometric measurementsrepresenting the vertical dimension were reported for each group. A two-sample t-test was used toassess differences in changes in mandibular plane angle and overbite between the two treatmentgroups.
Results: There were no statistical differences found in the magnitude of overbite correction and thechanges in any of the cephalometric measurements for vertical control. The clear aligner groupshowed a slightly greater amount of lower incisor extrusion (P . .009). The main mechanism ofopen bite correction was similar between the two treatment groups and was accomplished throughretroclination of the upper and lower incisors while maintaining the vertical position of the upper andlower molars.
Conclusions: Cephalometric comparison of anterior open bite correction and changes in themandibular plane angle associated with use of clear aligners and fixed appliances did notdemonstrate statistically significant differences in adult hyperdivergent patients. (Angle Orthod.0000;00:000–000.)
2019 |
Garnett, B; Mahod, K; Nguyen, M; Al-Khateeb, A; Liu, S; Boyd, R; Oh, H: Cephalometric comparison of adult anterior open bite treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances.. In: Angle Orthodontist, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 3-9, 2019. (Type: Journal Article | Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: AAOF, Cone-beam computed tomography, Cranial base, craniofacial, Discrepency Index, extraction, fixed appliances, hyperdivergent, mandibular asymmetry, Mandibular fixed retainer, Mandibular remodeling, mapping, open bite, Peer Assessment Rating Index, Posttreatment, research, x-ray)@article{Garnett2019, To compare fixed appliances and clear aligner therapy in correcting anterior open bite and in controlling the vertical dimension in adult patients with hyperdivergent skeletal patterns. |
2017 |
Hwang, Hyeon-Shik; Oh, Min-Hee; Oh, Hee-Kyun; Oh, Heesoo: Surgery-first approach in correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry. In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 255-267, 2017. (Type: Journal Article | Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: AAOF, adult, Class III, Cranial base, Discrepency Index, hyperdivergent, mandibular asymmetry, Mandibular fixed retainer, Mandibular remodeling, mapping, open bite, orthodontic, surgery-first)@article{Hwang2017, This case report describes a surgical orthodontic case that used the recently introduced surgery-first approach to correct a severe skeletal Class III malocclusion. A 19-year-old woman presented with severe mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry; she had been waiting for growth completion in order to pursue surgical correction. After prediction of the postsurgical tooth movement and surgical simulation, 2-jaw surgery that included maxillary advancement and differential mandibular setback was performed using a surgery-first approach. Immediate facial improvement was achieved and postsurgical orthodontic treatment was efficiently carried out. The total treatment time was 16 months. The patient's facial appearance improved significantly and a stable surgical orthodontic outcome was obtained. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:255-67) |
2010 |
Xu, T-M; Zhang, X; Oh, HS; Boyd, R; Korn, El; Baumrind, S: A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) Comparing Maxillary Molar Anchorage Loss Using Two Retraction Techniques.. In: American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 544-5, 2010. (Type: Journal Article | Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, clinical orthodontist, Cone-beam computed tomography, Cranial base, hyperdivergent, Mandibular fixed retainer, open bite, orthodontic, Peer Assessment Rating Index, retrospective)@article{Xu2010, The objective of this pilot randomized clinical trial was to investigate the relative effectiveness of anchorage conservation of en-masse and 2-step retraction techniques during maximum anchorage treatment in patients with Angle Class I and Class II malocclusions. |
2008 |
Xu, T-M; Korn, EL; Liu, Y; Oh, HS; Lee, KH; Baumrind, S: "Facial Attractiveness": Ranking of End-of-Treatment Facial Photographs by Chinese and U.S. Orthodontists.. In: American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 74-84, 2008. (Type: Journal Article | Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: AAOF, Adolescents, anterior openbite, clinical orthodontist, Cone-beam computed tomography, Cranial base, hyperdivergent, Mandibular fixed retainer, open bite, retrospective)@article{Xu2008, In this study, we assessed agreement and disagreement among pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists in the ranking for "facial attractiveness" of end-of-treatment photographs of growing Chinese and white orthodontic patients. |
0000 |
Garnett, Bella Shen; Mahood, Kimberly; Nguyen, Mai; Al-Khateeb, Aliaa; Liu, Siqi; Boyd, Robert; Oh, Heesoo: Cephalometric comparison of anterior openbite tx using clear aligners and fixed appliances. In: Angle Orthodontist, Forthcoming. (Type: Journal Article | Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, anterior openbite, clear aligners, fixed appliances, hyperdivergent, open bite, vertical control)@article{Garnett, Objectives: To compare fixed appliances and clear aligner therapy in correcting anterior open biteand in controlling the vertical dimension in adult patients with hyperdivergent skeletal patterns. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, two treatment groups of adult (_18 years old)hyperdivergent patients (mandibular plane angles of _388) with anterior open bites were included:17 fixed appliance patients and 36 clear aligner patients. Thirteen cephalometric measurementsrepresenting the vertical dimension were reported for each group. A two-sample t-test was used toassess differences in changes in mandibular plane angle and overbite between the two treatmentgroups. Results: There were no statistical differences found in the magnitude of overbite correction and thechanges in any of the cephalometric measurements for vertical control. The clear aligner groupshowed a slightly greater amount of lower incisor extrusion (P . .009). The main mechanism ofopen bite correction was similar between the two treatment groups and was accomplished throughretroclination of the upper and lower incisors while maintaining the vertical position of the upper andlower molars. Conclusions: Cephalometric comparison of anterior open bite correction and changes in themandibular plane angle associated with use of clear aligners and fixed appliances did notdemonstrate statistically significant differences in adult hyperdivergent patients. (Angle Orthod.0000;00:000–000.) |